SHPIEG

Brazil's 2026 presidential election: the probabilities

Lula leads the first-round polls. Trouble is, for 6 elections running his party's rivals have beaten their polls.

Flávio Bolsonaro71–80%Chance of winning
Lula20–29%Chance of winning
Chance of a runoff 74%
1272026 polls analysed
19polling firms
396polls from past elections 2002–2022
6past elections used to test the model
334sources with a saved copy
3,778documents downloaded and parsed
2,132candidate posts on social media
69verified positions of key players

1 The bottom line

The key assumption in one line. In 4 of 5 past cases, runoff polls taken before the first round overstated PT; we carry this correction over in softened form (on average 2.3 points against Lula). If this time the head-to-head polls do not systematically overstate Lula, his chance is 41%.

2 Who finishes first in the first round — and why we part ways with the polls

Poll average Model expectation (median) Chance of finishing first Chance of winning outright, with no runoff
Lula 44.3% 43.7% 36% 7%
Flávio Bolsonaro 42.1% 46.3% 64% 18%

Lula leads the poll average. The model takes into account that in all 6 past elections PT's first-round gap to its rivals came out worse than in the polls, and shifts the gap by 4.8 points against PT on average. That is why, according to the model, Flávio Bolsonaro is more likely to finish first. The Kalshi market and the Plano Político model put Lula's chance of finishing first at 74% and 70% respectively [1][2].

A check on election night (4 Oct 2026). The Lula-minus-Flávio margin is 2.2 points in the poll average and -2.6 points in the model's expectation. If the actual margin turns out no smaller than in the polls, the historical skew has not repeated this time, and our estimate for Lula is too low.

The chance that it is all settled in the first round is 26% (Flávio 18%, Lula 7%). Kalshi prices this outcome at 4% [3] — one of our larger disagreements with the market: the model allows for large polling errors and therefore sees extreme outcomes more often.

30405028 Aug18 Sep2 OctFlávio Bolsonaro: 41.1%Flávio Bolsonaro: 35%Flávio Bolsonaro: 40.5%Flávio Bolsonaro: 40.7%Flávio Bolsonaro: 40.9%Flávio Bolsonaro: 42.1%Lula: 44.5%Lula: 41.9%Lula: 44.4%Lula: 43.9%Lula: 43.4%Lula: 44.4%LulaFlávio BolsonaroFlávio BolsonaroLula
First-round polls: weekly average, % of valid votes
DateFlávio BolsonaroLula
28 Aug41.1%44.5%
4 Sep35%41.9%
11 Sep40.5%44.4%
18 Sep40.7%43.9%
25 Sep40.9%43.4%
2 Oct42.1%44.4%

3 Scenarios: “if X happens, Lula's chance is Y”

We do not estimate the probability of the events themselves — only what happens to the chances if an event occurs. The size of each shift is taken from a real, measured past case.

If… Lula's chance
Our range 20% to 29%
The polls miss as they did in the “Bolsonaro versus PT” elections (2018, 2022) 19%
The polls miss as they did in the years when PT was in power (2006, 2010, 2014) 13%
A repeat of 2006 — the only swing back to PT between the rounds 50%
This time the head-to-head polls do not overstate Lula (no historical correction) 41%
A scandal on the scale of May 2026 — against Flávio 62%
The same scandal — against Lula 8%

Why the “polls miss as they did…” rows sit below our range. In those rows the polling error is taken exactly as it was in those years, with no softening and in both rounds at once. The main estimate allows for the error to be smaller this time, or even to run the other way, as in 2006. If history repeats itself in full, Lula's chance would be roughly 19%.

Where the size of the scandal comes from. After audio recordings of Flávio with the banker Vorcaro were published (13 May 2026), Lula gained an average of 3.4 points in head-to-head polls across the 6 pollsters with a poll both before and after [4]. Over the same period Flávio's support fell most visibly among evangelicals [5]. In the calculation the shift is applied to both rounds — to the first-round gap and to the runoff head-to-head polls — which is why the chance moves so much.

What it would take for the chances to even out. This time PT would have to fall short of its polls by noticeably less than usual. The first-round miss (result minus polls on PT's margin over its rivals) would have to be no lower than -0.5 points — this happened in 0 of 6 cases. The miss of the runoff head-to-head polls would have to be no lower than -0.1 points — this happened in 1 of 5 cases.

4 Our model versus betting markets and other forecasts

Who Flávio's chance Lula's chance Lula first in the first round
Our model 71% to 80% 20% to 29% 36%
Polymarket (trading volume $161 million) [6] 56% 44% —
Kalshi [7][1] 57% 43% 74%
PredictIt [8] 61% 45% —
Plano Político model [2] 58% 42% 70%
ÍRIS model [9] 68% 32% —
PollingData model (BBC Brasil partner) [10] — — 79%

In our model the favourite is Flávio Bolsonaro; on Polymarket, the largest market, the favourite is Flávio Bolsonaro. Our estimate for Lula is below the market's, and on the question of who finishes first we part ways with the markets and with other models. This does not prove the market wrong: our first-round forecast rests on a correction that history has confirmed (see “How we calculated”), while the headline chance depends on the runoff correction, which history cannot test. A betting-market price is not an exact probability either: it is shaped by fees, traders' tendency to overpay for long shots (the favourite–longshot bias) and the size of the market.

5 Calendar: what to watch

6 Sources

No.SourceDate accessedCopy
1kalshi.com link2 Oct 2026copy
2planopolitico.com.br link2 Oct 2026copy
3kalshi.com link2 Oct 2026copy
4mais.opovo.com.br link1 Oct 2026copy
5www.portaltela.com link1 Oct 2026copy
6polymarket.com link2 Oct 2026copy
7kalshi.com link2 Oct 2026copy
8www.predictit.org link2 Oct 2026copy
9voga-iris.com link2 Oct 2026copy
10flex.pollingdata.com.br link2 Oct 2026copy
11www.correiobraziliense.com.br link1 Oct 2026copy
12www.otempo.com.br link2 Oct 2026copy
13cdn.tse.jus.br link1 Oct 2026copy
14pt.wikipedia.org link1 Oct 2026copy

All data come from public sources. This is an estimate of probabilities, not investment advice.